What conclusion can be drawn about audiences’ responses to Stein's book "Tender Buttons"?

The conclusion that audiences were often confused by the contents of Stein's "Tender Buttons" reflects the book’s avant-garde nature and its departure from traditional narrative forms. Stein's work is known for its experimental language, non-linear structure, and abstract representations of everyday objects and actions. As a result, many readers may have struggled to find clarity or a conventional storyline, leading to confusion about the text’s meaning and intention.

This confusion underscores the book's role in modernist literature, where challenging the norms of writing can evoke mixed reactions, often rooted in uncertainty among readers who expect more conventional literary forms. Understanding this aspect allows readers to appreciate the modernist movement and the impact of authors like Stein on literature, highlighting how innovative approaches can provoke a wide range of responses from audiences.